Pic Credit : web |
He's one of three G1 Autobots Triple-Changer with Springer and Sandstorm. He transformed into a jet fighter (F/A-18 Hornet) and a 1200 ft aircraft carrier (mass shifting, apparently)
Still, that's not the biggest problem. Although impossible, he has a great design which sadly wasn't presented all that well
Problem? It's 1986 for god sake! |
Alt Mode
His first alt mode would be an aircraft carrier. Although, Fansproject interpretation of it wasn't as his G1 counterpart rather Macross-like carrier
He does have a few details that are consider hit-and-miss and for such a massive figure, the tabs are too little which easily unlock.
Even so, the alt mode is well executed and 'plausible' enough which I'm able to tolerate considering he's a triple changer
He's twice the length of Ramjet |
Second alt mode would be a fighter jet. And looking at this, I really don't mind about his carrier mode
Fierce fighter |
Slick design. Considering his massive and bulky robot mode, Fansproject did wonders designing such seamless alt mode
Comparison with Ramjet |
Robot Mode
Presenting, one of the Wreckers, Not-Broadside! I got to say, Fansproject went on extra length to incorporate as homage as they can to this design.
Back view |
I would rather prefer this configuration for the legs
Head sculpt |
The next gimmick would be alternate head (inside of the helmet)
Nope, not my cup of tea |
The last gimmick would be the alternate cockpit. Although most of the gimmicks might seems petty, it give chance for fans to choose their preferred configurations
Stability Test - Pass! |
Design that limits the articulation of the thigh |
One thing that surprise me was the articulations of this massive figure.
Swivel joints on the thighs, ankle tilts, waist joint, ball jointed wrists, swivel joints on the shoulders and a ball jointed head
Smash! |
He comes with 2-changer weapons set, one would be dual-wielding energon axes (homaging his G1 weapon)
And also Ion-Blasters
Comparison shot |
nak pinjaammm i promise i wont break it this time
ReplyDeletealternate head x lawa
maybe you could disable the verification setting on this comment box..?
ReplyDelete